|
|
|

|
|
|
-
-
-
The
'Short Course' to Modernity: Stalinist History Textbooks, Mass
Culture and the Formation of Popular Russian National
Identity, 1934-1956 (Ph.D. diss, Harvard
University, 1999)
-
-
-
-
History
textbooks sanctioned by the state between 1937 and 1956 provided Soviet
society with a narrative which allowed Russians as a group to imagine
for the first time what it meant to be members of a national community.
Since the cultivation of a mass sense of Russian national identity
had been frustrated by the tsarist and early Soviet states, nation-centered
history only became a major component of public and party education
some twenty years after the revolution. In tone and content more nationalist
than internationalist, the post-1937 generation of history textbooks
signaled a profound sea-change in ideology which would engulf state-sponsored
mass culture by the end of the decade. Stalinist social mentalite
could hardly remain unaffected.
-
-
Although
explicitly nationalistic sentiments surfaced among Russians in
Soviet society only in the 1960s in connection with environmental
protectionism, the preservation of historic monuments, and the
celebration of "village
prose," it is generally agreed that these movements drew upon older
notions of Russian national identity already in wide circulation.
While some of these beliefs date back to the ancien régime,
it is not possible to speak of them as contributing to a single coherent
national identity before the 1930s because the society's political
and historical consciousness varied significantly from region to region.
The present work argues that modern Russian national identity only
coalesced on the popular level under Stalin as a consequence of the
introduction of the society's first mass history curriculum and attendant
transformations in popular forums ranging from literature and film
to theater and opera.
-
-
A study
of ideological reception as much as production, this
work considers both the evolution of the official party line and that
line's impact on the popular level. If research in almost a dozen
archives informs the production end of the study, an extensive survey
of diaries, letters and secret police reports provides glimpses of
ordinary people's reaction to stalinist propaganda. Seen from the
perspective of theorists like Benedict Anderson, Ernest Gellner and
Miroslav Hroch, this latter material points to the emergence of an
increasingly coherent sense of national consciousness among Russians
between 1934 and 1956. Focusing on party and public education against
the backdrop of literature, film and the arts, this study analyzes
the heretofore unappreciated connection between stalinist history
textbooks, mass culture and the formation of popular Russian national
identity.
-
-
-
-
-
-
|
|
|

|