Evaluation

You will all be graded individually and collectively as a group. Individual grading will be based on the quality and thoroughness of research and how effectively you conveyed your expert area to the rest of the group. Collective grading will include the presentation, accuracy, and creativity of the video.

Beginning

1

Developing

2

Accomplished

3

Exemplary

4

Score

 

Use of class time

 
Did not use class time to work on project or distracted others from their work
Focused on project occasionally. Majority of time still disturbing others and not working.
Worked on the project most of the time. Did not distract others.
Always focused on using class time for project. Never caused distraction.

 

Research quality and content

 

 

 

The student is able to extract information from the Web but does not apply the information to their expert field. Research may be incomplete

 

The student is able to extract information from the Web but does not answer role-related questions. in their expert field.

 

The student is able to extract some important facts from the Web to answer role-related questions.

 

The student is able to extract all the important information from the Web that relates to their expert field and role-related questions.

 

Video quality and content

 

 

Does not include important information from each expert. Information is not presented in a clear manner. Appears sloppy or poorly designed.

Lacks preparation and creativity.

Includes some important information but not from every expert. Appears a little messy, multiple errors exist.

 

Minimal preparation, organization unclear.

Includes all important information from most of the experts. Appears attractive and neat with only a few errors present.

Adequate preparation, creativity, and use of terminology.

Includes all important information from all of the experts. Final product is exceptionally attractive and neat, containing no errors.

Exemplary preparation, creativity, and use of terminology and concepts.


 

Peer Evaluation

 
Did not participate in the evaluation process .
Minimal completion of evaluation.
Participated in the evaluation process, but lacked detail.
Well thought out peer evaluation. Included significant detail and useful feedback.

 

Collaborative performance
Did not cooperate with group members or very disruptive.
Minimal cooperation with group members. Acted as a distraction.
Cooperated well with group members but focused more on individual work.
Cooperated extremely well with group. Individual work essential to final product.