Evaluation
You will be evaluated in three categories:
30 points - Individual school board member research on example of hysteria in history.
35 points - Group school board advisory committee hysteria prevention proposal.
35 points - Group school board advisory committee hysteria management proposal
Research Rubric
|
Poor 1 point |
Fair 4 points |
Good 7 points |
Excellent 10 points |
Score |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Evidence of Research (10 points)
|
Evidence of 0-1 links visited. Directions for links were not followed.
|
Evidence of 1-2 links visited. Some of the directions for links were followed.
|
Evidence of 3-4 links visited. Most of the directions for links were followed
|
Evidence that all links provided were visited.
All of the directions for links were followed. |
|
|
Historical Accuracy of Answers (10 points)
|
2-3 historical inaccuracies. No evidence of understanding the historical event.
|
0-1 historical inaccuracies. Limited evidence of understanding the historical event.
|
No historical inaccuracies. Some evidence of understanding the historical event.
|
No historical inaccuracies. Thorough evidence of understanding the historical event. |
|
|
Quality of Answers (10 points)
|
Poor analysis and interpretations of historical event not supported by research.
|
Partial analysis and interpretations of historical events insufficiently supported by research.
|
Sufficient analysis, but lacks evidence of higher level thinking. Interpretations of historical events supported by research.
|
Exceptional analysis and evidence of higher level thinking. Interpretations of historical evidents supported by research.
|
|
Prevention Proposal Rubric
| Poor 1 point |
Fair 3 points |
Good 5 points |
Excellent 7 points |
Score |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Process of prevention proposal (7 points) |
Process not explained. Porposal not feasible. Illogical sequence and insufficient amount of steps.
|
Process explained, but most parts unclear. Proposla may not be feasible. Illogical sequence of steps.
|
Process explained, but some parts unclear. Porposal is feasible. Steps are logical but lack depth. |
Process thoroughly explained. Proposal is feasible. Logical sequence of steps.
|
|
Justificaiton of prevention proposal (7 points)
|
Addresses few or no persons involved. Fails to consider school or community reaction |
Addresses some persons involved. Little consideration of school community reaction.
|
Addresses most persons involved. Some consideration of school and community reaction. |
Addresses all persons involved. Consideration of school and community reaction.
|
|
Support from individual research (7 points) |
Proposal not supported by research. No examples of support.
|
Proposal partially supported by research. Few examples of support.
|
Proposal mostly supported by research. Some examples of support.
|
Proposal fully supported by research. Numerous examples of support.
|
|
Expected results from prevention proposal (7 points)
|
Unrealistc expectations. Fails to address problem.
|
Idealistic expectations. Address some aspects of problem.
|
Realistc expectations. Addresses most aspects of problem.
|
Realistc expectations. Fully addresses problem.
|
|
Technical Accuracy (7 points) |
Numerous grammatical errors. MLA fomat not followed.
|
Some grammatical erros. Some MLA format errors.
|
Few grammatical errors. Few MLA format errors.
|
No grammatical errors. MLA format correctly followed
|
|
Hysteria Management Proposal
| Poor 1 point |
Fair 3 points |
Good 5 points |
Excellent 7 points |
Score |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Process of hysteria management proposal (7 points) |
Process not explained. Porposal not feasible. Illogical sequence and insufficient amount of steps.
|
Process explained, but most parts unclear. Proposla may not be feasible. Illogical sequence of steps.
|
Process explained, but some parts unclear. Porposal is feasible. Steps are logical but lack depth.
|
Process thoroughly explained. Proposal is feasible. Logical sequence of steps.
|
|
Justificaiton of hysteria management proposal (7 points)
|
Addresses few or no persons involved. Fails to consider school or community reaction |
Addresses some persons involved. Little consideration of school community reaction.
|
Addresses most persons involved. Some consideration of school and community reaction.
|
Addresses all persons involved. Consideration of school and community reaction. |
|
Support from individual research (7 points) |
Proposal not supported by research. No examples of support.
|
Proposal partially supported by research. Few examples of support.
|
Proposal mostly supported by research. Some examples of support.
|
Proposal fully supported by research. Numerous examples of support.
|
|
Expected results from hysteria management proposal (7 points)
|
Unrealistc expectations. Fails to address problem.
|
Idealistic expectations. Address some aspects of problem.
|
Realistc expectations. Addresses most aspects of problem.
|
Realistc expectations. Fully addresses problem.
|
|
Technical Accuracy (7 points) |
Numerous grammatical errors. MLA fomat not followed.
|
Some grammatical erros. Some MLA format errors.
|
Few grammatical errors. Few MLA format errors.
|
No grammatical errors. MLA format correctly followed
|
|